Executive Overview
In the contemporary literary landscape, few works interrogate the silent violence of historical curation as sharply as Catie Rosemurgy’s latest featured piece, "Diorama 1871 (while a pie burns, the schoolteacher’s wife keeps going)." Selected as the Missouri Review Poem of the Week, Rosemurgy’s work acts as both a literary triumph and an unsettling cultural artifact. The poem confronts readers with the visceral, overwhelming influx of colonial settlement—its tools, its claims, its bodies, and its inevitable fractures—captured within the miniature, static world of a local history museum diorama.
Rosemurgy, an acclaimed poet and professor at the College of New Jersey whose previous collections include My Favorite Apocalypse and The Stranger Manual (both published by Graywolf Press), has built a reputation for lyrical acuity and deep psychological exploration. Her fellowships from the Pew Foundation, the National Endowment for the Arts, and the Rona Jaffe Foundation underscore her standing as a major voice in American poetry. Yet, "Diorama 1871" pushes her artistic boundaries outward, transforming a quiet, localized encounter with midwestern museum curation into a sweeping meditation on the systemic amnesia that characterizes the American frontier narrative.
The core of the work stems from an acute discomfort: the stark omission of Indigenous displacement and colonial violence within local history museums. By breathing eerie, relentless life into the tiny figures of an abandoned town’s diorama, Rosemurgy exposes the fatal mixture of institutional inability and willful ignorance that prevents modern society from confronting its foundational traumas. As the poem catalogs everything from "stools, bunks, bowls, shovels" to "pithings, pokings, severings, suturings, swellings," it builds a rhythmic, accumulating avalanche of physical and material history. Ultimately, the piece poses a vital question for our cultural moment: How do we account for a history so overwhelming, so violent, and so meticulously sanitized that accurate records become impossible, leaving a community adrift in a sea of forgotten pain?
Read Also
Detailed Chronology: From Regional Museum to Lyrical Monument
To understand the genesis of "Diorama 1871," one must retrace the precise sequence of events and artistic realizations that inspired Rosemurgy’s creative breakthrough. The project did not begin in a writing studio or an archive, but within the liminal spaces of small-town cultural institutions in the upper Midwest.
The Spark of Inquiry
The journey began during a personal visit to two regional history museums situated not far from the landscape of Rosemurgy’s childhood. These institutions, common fixtures across rural America, are ostensibly dedicated to preserving the pioneer heritage and early settlement eras of their respective locales. However, as Rosemurgy walked through the exhibits, a profound and troubling absence drew her attention. The curation systematically sidestepped, sanitized, and erased the foundational role of colonial settlement and Indigenous displacement.
In the days following the visit, this institutional silence lingered, transforming from a passive omission into something "hauntingly malignant." Museums are designed to construct narratives of civic pride, progress, and ingenuity; yet, in these spaces, the omission of the true costs of settlement created a hollow, uncanny distortion of reality.
Encountering the Miniature
One of the museums featured a centerpiece diorama depicting the town during its 1871 heyday—a once-thriving frontier hub that had long since transitioned into a deserted ghost town. Standing before the glass case, staring down at the tiny, meticulously painted white figures frozen in eternal domestic and industrial postures, Rosemurgy experienced a profound shift in perspective.
The diorama offered a metaphor for the broader American historical consciousness: frozen, miniaturized, sanitized, and safely enclosed behind protective glass. The figures were trapped in a perpetual reenactment of pioneer industriousness, completely insulated from the chaos, blood, and systemic displacement that made their settlement possible.
The Genesis of the Diorama Poems
Faced with this manufactured stasis, Rosemurgy sought a poetic mechanism to shatter the glass case. She began writing a new manuscript centered on a radical proposition: What if the tiny white figures in the diorama began to speak?
"Diorama 1871" emerged as a central pillar of this ongoing project. By charting the arrival of the newcomers—not through abstract historical summaries, but through a breathless, accumulating catalog of their possessions, tools, legal claims, and physical anatomies—Rosemurgy constructed a poetic apparatus capable of holding the sheer weight of historical expansion. The chronology of the poem moves from the external accumulation of material goods to the internal, bodily toll of frontier life, ultimately culminating in institutional and collective amnesia: "Accurate records could not be maintained. They lost track of what hurt and how much and who felt it."
Supporting Context & Metrics: The Anatomy of Historical Erasure
To fully appreciate the cultural weight of Rosemurgy’s work, it is necessary to examine the broader landscape of American regional museology and the specific literary mechanics she employs.
The Politics of Museum Curation in the Upper Midwest
Regional history museums occupy a unique, influential space in public education and cultural memory. According to historical preservation data, thousands of local historical societies operate across the American Midwest, many founded during the late 19th and early 20th centuries—precisely the era when pioneer mythologies were actively being forged to legitimize westward expansion.
- The Myth of Vacant Land: Traditional local history curation frequently relies on tropes of the "untouched wilderness" or "empty frontier," effectively erasing centuries of complex Indigenous governance, trade, and habitation.
- Material Culture Over Systemic Violence: Exhibits routinely prioritize artifacts of domesticity and labor—bunks, bowls, shovels, and ledgers—while omitting the instruments of subjugation, treaty violations, and forced removal.
- The Miniature Aesthetic: Dioramas, popularised in museums throughout the 20th century, reduce complex socio-political conflicts to picturesque, controllable tableaux. They invite spectatorship and nostalgia, neutralizing the discomfort of historical trauma by rendering it bite-sized and orderly.
Literary Mechanics and Structural Metrics
In "Diorama 1871," Rosemurgy subverts the orderly expectations of the museum diorama through deliberate stylistic choices. The poem utilizes a relentless, cascading cataloging technique that mimics the overwhelming, unstoppable influx of settlers into Gold River.
[Material Influx] ──> [Legal & Social Claims] ──> [Bodily Fragmentation] ──> [Pathology & Trauma] ──> [Systemic Amnesia]
(Tools, Ships) (Stakes, Ledgers) (Elbows, Femurs) (Fevers, Boils) (Lost Records)- Anaphora and Accumulation: The poem’s middle section relies on dense lists introduced by the overwhelming presence of "so much sudden." By stacking nouns—ranging from the mundane (stools, pins, buttons) to the industrial (chutes, freighters, levers) and the anatomical (femurs, arteries, knuckles)—Rosemurgy mirrors the chaotic accumulation of frontier life.
- The Bodily Turn: Midway through the catalog, the poem shifts abruptly from inanimate objects to human anatomy: "elbows, tongues, femurs, arteries, knuckles, spines." This transition bridges the gap between settlement infrastructure and bodily sacrifice, reminding the reader that the frontier was built out of flesh and blood as much as timber and iron.
- Pathology as Historical Record: The final movement of the catalog descends into an exhaustive list of physical maladies and injuries: spills, rots, fractures, infections, fevers, fugues, boils, oozings, and chokings. Here, Rosemurgy suggests that the true legacy of colonial expansion is not merely economic or architectural, but pathological—a deep, systemic wounding that registers across both body and mind.
Official Statements & Author’s Perspective
In an exclusive Author’s Note provided alongside the publication of the poem, Catie Rosemurgy articulates the profound ethical and artistic motivations driving her current body of work:
"This poem is from a book I began writing after visiting two local history museums in the upper Midwest near where I grew up. Both museums largely ignore the role of colonial settlement in their curation, and that silence felt hauntingly malignant to me in the days after my visit. One of the museums features a diorama of the once-thriving, now-deserted town in which the museum is located.
As a way of exploring the fatal mixture of inability and unwillingness that prevents us from developing a shared, public narrative of our history, I began to write poems that imagine the tiny, white figures in the diorama beginning to speak."
Rosemurgy’s critique targets two distinct psychological and institutional barriers:
- Inability: The cognitive and structural difficulty modern societies face when attempting to synthesize vast, contradictory historical narratives without relying on comforting myths of innocence and progress.
- Unwillingness: The active, defensive resistance communities exhibit when forced to confront the uncomfortable truths of displacement, structural violence, and complicity that underpin local heritage.
By giving voice to the silent, static figures of the diorama, Rosemurgy bypasses the official museum plaque. She replaces sanitized institutional messaging with a polyphonic, unruly chorus that insists on remembering what the displays were explicitly designed to forget.
Future Outlook: The Evolution of Historical Poetics
The publication of "Diorama 1871" as the Missouri Review Poem of the Week signals a vital shift in contemporary American poetry toward institutional critique and archival intervention. As cultural heritage sites face mounting pressure to decolonize their exhibits and re-evaluate their curatorial practices, poetry is increasingly serving as an indispensable tool for cultural excavation.
Implications for Contemporary Literature and Curation
- Challenging Institutional Silence: Rosemurgy’s work provides a template for how contemporary writers can engage with local history museums not as passive repositories of nostalgia, but as active sites of contestation and revision.
- The Poetics of the Archive: By juxtaposing the bureaucratic language of ledgers and claims with the visceral reality of bodily trauma, future poetry collections are likely to continue exploring the intersections of state-sanctioned history and repressed personal suffering.
- Public Engagement with Difficult Pasts: As the manuscript centered around these diorama poems nears completion, it promises to spark broader public conversations about how towns across the American Midwest—and the nation at large—can move beyond silence toward honest, shared historical reckoning.
In "Diorama 1871," Catie Rosemurgy has done more than craft a brilliant poem; she has constructed a literary memorial for the unspoken. By forcing the tiny, frozen inhabitants of a midwestern museum display to speak of their tools, their claims, their wounds, and their ultimate disappearance, she challenges us all to look closer at the glass cases of our own histories—and to finally listen to what is trying to break through the silence.
Comments
Facebook App ID not configured. Please add it in the Customizer.